Policy Paper | June 2013

Enhancing Direct Access to the Green Climate Fund


At the third meeting of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) Board in March 2013, Board members considered the different ways for developing countries to access funding. They agreed that “a country-driven approach is a core principle to build the business model of the Fund” and noted this as an area of convergence among its members.

Some Board members from developing countries stressed that direct access to the GCF is one of the key structures for country ownership. Under direct access, national governments or their nominated national and subnational institutions receive international climate funds and disburse them to relevant projects. Developing country Board members argued for this ‘access modality’ (procedure or mechanism) to be prioritised by the Board in the design of the Fund, including a provision for enhanced direct access. However, some developed country Board members argued that while direct access is important, it is one of several possible access modalities. The Board noted that the GCF should: “commence as a fund that operates through accredited national, regional and international intermediaries and implementing entities” (CCF/B.01-13/06), which leaves all options for access modalities open – including a larger role for multilateral agencies, for example.

A new policy brief on Enhancing Direct Access to the Green Climate Fund by the Frankfurt School, Germanwatch and ENDA Tiers Monde for the Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) contributes to the ongoing debate around access modalities for the GCF. In particular, the paper:

  • explains the terminology around ‘direct access’ and ‘enhanced direct access’, outlining the competencies and capacities needed at each institutional level  to achieve direct access
  • reviews recent experience of using the direct access approach in international climate funds
  • makes recommendations to the GCF Board and others.

Key messages include:

  • The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Board must put access modalities in place as soon as possible, so it can start disbursing funds. In the meantime, it could consider the conditional, interim accreditation of institutions that have been accredited by other climate funds.
  • The Board should learn from the experiences of others, particularly the Adaptation Fund and the Global Environment Facility (GEF), regarding how to provide developing countries with direct access to climate finance.
  • The Board should note some of the particular barriers to direct access in the past – for example, difficulties in achieving fiduciary standards – and the need to build developing countries’ capacity in these areas.
  • The degree of direct access to the GCF will also depend on each country’s ability to devolve decision-making power to the lowest effective level in its governance structure, at the national or subnational level.
David Eckstein
Policy Advisor for Climate Finance and Investments at Germanwatch
+49(0) 228 / 60 492-45
+49 (0)228 60 492-19